THE SOLE REASON WHY A NEGATIVE RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SECTION II, QUESTION 6 OF THIS APPLICATION IS THAT THE COPY OF THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION AND PLACED IN THE STATIONS RECORDS HAS BEEN REDACTED TO REMOVE CERTAIN CLAUSES AND SCHEDULES WHICH CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR PROPRIETARY COMMERCIAL INFORMATION. THE LICENSEE BELIEVES THE REDACTED INFORMATION TO HAVE NO RELEVANCE TO THE COMMISSIONS REGULATORY FUNCTIONS OR BEARING ON THE COMMISSIONS REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SHOULD THE COMMISSION REQUEST THAT THE LICENSEE FILE AN UNREDACTED COPY OF THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT, IT WILL PROMPTLY DO SO UNDER COVER OF A REQUEST THAT THE UNREDACTED AGREEMENT BE MAINTAINED UNDER SEAL IN THE COMMISSIONS FILES. THE AGREEMENTS AMONG THE PARTIES INCLUDE A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT COVERING THE SOUTH BEND DESIGNATED MARKET AREA. SINCE THE SIGNALS OF THE STATIONS AT ISSUE RECEIVE MARKET-WIDE DISTRIBUTION OVER MVPDS, THE GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF THE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT IS REASONABLE. SEE RAUL SANTIAGO ROMAN, 38 FCC 2D 290, 294 (REV. BD. 1965); MID-ATLANTIC NETWORK, INC., 23 FCC RCD 7582 PAR. 13 & N. 40 (MEDIA BUR. 2008).